For the first time there are voices questioning Israel’s strategic value
TIMES online
16 Marzo 2010
“Il generale David Petraeus, potente capo dell’US General Command, mette apertamente in dubbio il valore di Israele come alleato strategico”.
Sit down at any dinner table in the Arab world and the conversation will
inevitably turn to one of the enduring mysteries of the region. How is it
that America has shown such unwavering support for Israel over the decades?
The answer provokes all manner of tortured conspiracy theories about the power
of the Israel lobby, the influence of right-wing Christian groups and varied
explanations for the gravity-defying trick that enables a tiny tail to wag
such a big dog.
Few accept a simpler answer. America supported Israel during the Cold War and
built the Jewish state into the most formidable military power in one of the
world’s most strategic regions.
While America enjoys strong relations with various Arab regimes, none has come
close to matching Israel as a stable democracy and regional superpower.
When America’s direct interests have been threatened by Israeli actions — for
instance in the Suez Crisis — Washington has intervened robustly and Israel
has backed away.
That is why Israeli leaders need to be particularly careful about how they
handle relations with Washington in the current row. Distracted by their own
internal politics and accustomed to dealing with two uncritical
administrations — Clinton and Bush — the Israelis took Vice-President Biden
for granted when he visited Israel last week. Instead of helping him to put
in place modest peace proposals with the Palestinians, they announced plans
for 1,600 Jewish homes in Arab east Jerusalem.
The Palestinians refused to negotiate under these circumstances and Mr Biden,
a strong supporter of Israel, went home humiliated and empty-handed.
This scenario has happened before. But for the first time there are other
voices — in this case General David Petraeus, the hugely influential head of
US Central Command — openly questioning Israel’s value as a strategic ally.
His defining experiences as a soldier, and those of most Americans in
uniform, have been Iraq and Afghanistan.
As America becomes more deeply involved in the Arab and Muslim worlds, with
nearly 200,000 troops in Iraq, the Gulf and Afghanistan, it will challenge
anything that may threaten US lives.
The Pentagon may be coming to the conclusion that the failure to achieve an
Arab-Israeli peace deal is the best recruiting sergeant for militant Islam.
Live footage of Palestinians being beaten or shot by Israeli troops are
beamed around the region on satellite news channels. They can whip up public
fury and angry sermons from Cairo to Kabul. America may not be directly
involved in these incidents but it is blamed for arming and funding Israel
and providing the Jewish state with diplomatic cover at the United Nations.
If America’s unwavering support for Israel is endangering the lives of US
troops in Kandahar or Baghdad, then the Jewish state has a problem.
Later this week President Obama will return to Indonesia, his childhood home
and the world’s most populous Muslim country. This should be an occasion
when he can reach out to the Islamic world and heal the wounds caused by the
September 11, 2001, attacks. For that he needs to know that his ally Israel
is willing to help make that job easier, not harder.
Source > TIMES online